This is our first exercise, so we haven't started to do the follow-up. But the intent is really to always do a three-year cycle with the report cards. So we do the report card, then we will do.... The next exercise this year will include a follow-up on the action plans of the institutions that were covered, and if they self-correct, we would not carry them on for the following year. But if they don't, we would follow up the following year.
The idea also is to provide advance notice to other institutions, such as the new institutions or the crown corporations that were added. Once we decide to do a report card on these institutions, we will give them advance notice. The idea is not to have a “get you” attitude. It is to give them an opportunity to self-discipline in advance, even, of our report cards.
The other thing the report cards do is provide this information in terms of the systemic formal investigation we want to follow up with. For instance, what we have found here is that the incidence of very lengthy extensions that are taken by institutions are extremely problematic in terms of access rights. So we're planning to follow up with a formal systemic investigation on extensions, which will go further on one of the issues specifically addressed in the report card. That's how they now flow together as opposed to being ad hoc and separate. They're more strategic.