Okay.
PIPEDA is grounded upon the constitutional authority in the second branch of the federal trade and commerce power. When initially it came into force, there was some question about the constitutional validity. That dropped off, for reasons unknown to myself.
Very recently, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a decision in the context of a national securities administrator and the movement to establish that. In the context of considering the establishment of a national securities administrator, the Supreme Court of Canada unanimously declared that the reliance on the trade and commerce power would be unconstitutional.
This, at least for those of us in the privacy arena, led to a natural question about the extent to which it's applicable to PIPEDA, and especially in the context of an environment where more enforcement powers might be provided to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada.
It's for constitutional experts to consider. I'm no constitutional expert. It's just that this was an important decision issued by the Supreme Court of Canada that is worthy of consideration in the context of any legislative initiative, in particular any that would expand enforcement powers, at least in my view.