Okay, Mr. Chair, it might not be appropriate but it's on the record. If we're going to get through this—and I don't want to spend all night here. But if you limit it to the identity of a journalistic source, you're talking about the name of a person, and that's the problem. Identity of a journalistic source is saying that this is not going to be released. That wouldn't be released anyway.
The problem with this is if we are just saying “source” as a person, then we're not talking about the issue of journalistic activities. I understand what my colleagues are trying to do, but they are creating a very narrow scope. This is not about the journalistic work, it's only about the name. I say the best way to deal with this would be if we just amended the amendment with “to reveal the identity of any journalistic activities”.