I would respectfully disagree with that. If you see how it was qualified, Mr. Cooper, as a lawyer, it's called “inconsistencies”. This is not me. Those are the words of Raymond Chabot. They've not called that a violation.
Let me finish on that, Mr. Chair. Just for your information, what we have demanded as well...but now we welcome the Auditor General's.... When we saw that, we decided to do what's called a “recipient audit”, Mr. Cooper. On the basis of that, you need to go to procedural fairness in order to do that. When we saw these findings—let me put it that way—I called for a recipient audit, which is a full audit of everything under the contribution agreement—