No, the numbers I've raised in my example compare the years 1995 through 1997. I mean, any number of tax changes since then may have affected that total, but I do that simply to show the difference between—
The argument by the Government of Canada at the time was that, as they were changing from U.S.-source taxation under the third protocol back to the fourth protocol, they would be returning to the way things were before January 1, 1996. I think many seniors were led to believe that, but that in fact was not the case; their taxes were still left, or the taxes they paid wound up still being significantly more, double in some cases, at the lowest income levels than what they were paying prior to January 1, 1996.
So we need to bring that back into line for them, I would suggest.