I guess, ultimately, it's a balance. We recognize the difficult decisions you have to make in balancing the logic of aligning the funding of the solvency deficits with what we think is a logical alignment over the lifetime in which they relate, against some of the concerns of the retirees and the participants. But we have also come forward and said that we actually stand for a lot of things they stand for, that is, transparency, or opening up and becoming far more transparent in providing regular valuations and providing those valuations to everyone openly and transparently.
Mike mentioned the importance of the strength of the plan's sponsor; and the other thing that will certainly help everyone is the strength of the economy. So it is a balance between getting the appropriate amount into the pension plans and having the corporations have enough money to put it into the economy get it moving again.