I support the principle of this amendment. It says in French: "(b) le ministre met à la disposition du", and in English the word "shall" is used. Actually, we discuss this here because we are dealing with charities and because public funds are involved. We are discussing this bill for reasons of transparency.
I think it would be too easy to make claims in order to get an exemption of one sort or another, for example regarding the location, the name or the salary of people. I believe that above all else a government must be as transparent as possible. This would avoid temptation to grant exceptions for which it might be chastised later on. My preference is to use "shall". This is the whole reasoning behind this bill. I do not like the idea of leaving it to the minister's discretion.