Evidence of meeting #22 for Finance in the 41st Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was debit.
A recording is available from Parliament.
March 4th, 2014 / 4 p.m.
Liberal
Scott Andrews Liberal Avalon, NL
Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
Mr. Maduri, we often hear through the Privacy Commissioner about people consenting to their information being used, and one thing the Privacy Commissioner has said is that we instead have smaller consent forms—like, get to the point of where your information will be disclosed. Often a lot of these consent forms are long-worded, lawyered-up consent forms.
Have you worked with the Privacy Commissioner of Canada to—
4:05 p.m.
Senior Director, Product Management, Mobile Payments, BlackBerry
I haven't worked with the Privacy Commissioner, but I am familiar with EULAs and user-licensing agreements being too big. Many times it's not necessarily due to us, it may be a third party that has built an app. It may be a bank that's built an application. A loyalty company may be doing it all for a right, and we can't necessarily control what they do. So if they want to offer a service to an end user, it's their EULA to allow the customer to disclose their location. As an example, a customer could say, “I'm close to this restaurant, send me an offer.” It's entirely up to them.
In terms of how we can address it, I'm not sure there's much we can do as a device manufacturer, other than bigger, clearer screens so people can read it. I don't think we can do much more than that.
4:05 p.m.
Senior Director, Product Management, Mobile Payments, BlackBerry
It's not my area of expertise. I know we've come across it. We've heard complaints regarding third-party applications. It's an area under review. The privacy people at BlackBerry could get back to you, if you're interested.
4:05 p.m.
Liberal
Scott Andrews Liberal Avalon, NL
Thank you.
Caroline, one of the things that I guess is more common, or you tell me if it is, is mobile payment disputes. How many disputes do you see? Do you have any statistics on how often there are mobile payment disputes?
4:05 p.m.
Head, External Affairs, Enterprise Strategy, Interac Association
Do you mean disputes in terms of a transaction, a customer—
4:05 p.m.
Head, External Affairs, Enterprise Strategy, Interac Association
Any dispute would be handled through the financial institution's complaint handling process, and all the financial institutions have pretty robust complaint handling procedures. So if there are any issues, those would be handled through that channel.
4:05 p.m.
Liberal
4:05 p.m.
Head, External Affairs, Enterprise Strategy, Interac Association
No, we're still in the rollout stage in mobile. If you're looking at fraudulent transactions, a couple of years ago the Canadian Code of Practice for Consumer Debit Card Services, which is overseen by the Financial Consumer Agency.... That's a voluntary code, although the financial institutions, and we as a network, subscribe to it. We embedded that into our rule framework so that anybody who's issuing a Interac Debit or Interac Flash would have to subscribe to that code. There are clear specifications on how to handle a dispute if there are fraudulent or disputed transactions.
4:05 p.m.
Liberal
Scott Andrews Liberal Avalon, NL
You think the banks and those institutions are the right bodies to handle those?
4:05 p.m.
Head, External Affairs, Enterprise Strategy, Interac Association
The Financial Consumer Agency of Canada monitors those, so if it escalates to a certain level—level 2—those are reported to the FCAC for oversight, as well there are ombudsman and third-party dispute resolution processes as part of the FI's complaint handling.
4:05 p.m.
Liberal
Scott Andrews Liberal Avalon, NL
Mr. Eby, in a brief you provided to the committee, you had concerns over unforeseen fees that would be an issue with the mobile payment. Could you elaborate a little on that, on where you see that going in the future?
4:05 p.m.
Director, Regulatory Affairs, Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association
We didn't have concerns. We had heard that concern from the business community and things like that. There was a lot of belief that when mobiles came and the payments were coming out, that the wireless industry was in it because they wanted to get a cut of the per transaction fee. That is not the case, and that model, I believe, was briefly tried in the United States where wireless companies wanted a piece of the interchange, and it just stalls the rollout. The real benefit is having more people using these options.
As I said, it's just like a dumb-pipe relationship. It's a flow through, especially with the secure element on the SIM, where your credit card information resides on the SIM card inside the phone. You don't even have to be connected to the wireless network to make a payment. It's the same as a contactless card. So the wireless provider doesn't know that the payment came from the phone. It could have come from the same credit card that you would have used. So there's no opportunity to build in a fee. If a financial institution made an agreement with a wireless company to give them a per transaction fee, it would have to be based on some kind of algorithm or prediction on how many payments were from mobile. But it wouldn't be an increased fee for retailers or consumers.
4:05 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative James Rajotte
Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Andrews.
We'll go to Mr. Keddy, please.
4:05 p.m.
Conservative
Gerald Keddy Conservative South Shore—St. Margaret's, NS
Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and welcome to our witnesses.
This has been probably one of the most interesting and fascinating studies we've done at committee—much more fun than all that budget stuff, which I'm sure we're going to get into.
I'm searching for some clear-cut parameters on how much the government interferes with or regulates the system that's out there now. Mr. Eby, you stated the need to secure software, to continue to drive the mobile payments agenda, and the need for a regulatory process.
We have a payment system that evolved with the technology. It started out—a lot of it—as social technology that then became for handling personal information and even personal banking, and now is moving to business. But it hasn't moved into the business world in a major way yet. How do we manage that? What's your recommendation? I would think there's some danger in stifling innovation. At the same time, should there be a regulatory regime that just has parameters, for example, that you have to have secure software, that you have to protect the consumer's interest, that the consumer has to be cognizant of the banking rules and regulations, or does it go to the other direction? Is it front end or back end?
4:10 p.m.
Director, Regulatory Affairs, Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association
It's a great question.
I think a lot of the regulations that could cover most of this stuff already exist. We submitted to the mobile addendum proceedings by finance over a year ago. We welcome them and the idea of bringing mobile into the credit and debit card code of conduct, just to make sure it's captured, because you're really just replicating debit and credit cards with mobile phones. The terminology needed to be changed to make sure one was not exempt versus the other. That was a very light-handed way to make sure this is included and to make sure you use technology that captures all types of payment options.
On the other side, in terms of personal information we have good privacy frameworks in place as well. That's already there. We have new anti-spam legislation, in terms of businesses taking this information and reaching back out to people. I don't know that special mobile payments regulation is needed. I think we can just look at how things can be addressed through the existing frameworks.
4:10 p.m.
Conservative
Gerald Keddy Conservative South Shore—St. Margaret's, NS
Would it be fair to say that we already have some great examples in place? The Interac example is one of them, where you have a relatively inexpensive payment system or platform. There shouldn't be an added fee just for having a card present or not.
4:10 p.m.
Director, Regulatory Affairs, Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association
Right.
4:10 p.m.
Conservative
Gerald Keddy Conservative South Shore—St. Margaret's, NS
Mr. Gaetz, you talked in the Mobile Payments Forum. In this forum in 2012, there were some key findings. Again, it was about how government can facilitate an expanding market, and have some regulation that doesn't stifle that expanding market.
How do you see government regulation? Or do you see it as government interference?
4:10 p.m.
President and Chief Executive Officer, Canadian Payments Association
Thank you for the question.
As has been mentioned, the frameworks, rules, and standards are largely in place. In the case of the Canadian Payments Association, those are firmly established. They've been modified over time. They've been modified with an eye to newer payment technologies, so they're in place.
I think part of the issue and challenge for governments—and all of us—is that you can't just put something in place and leave it, you have to monitor it in some way. Things are evolving so quickly, and part of it is that we don't know what we don't know. That's one of the big issues, security and cyber-security. So at the Canadian Payments Association, because what we do and need to do every day—20 hours a day, open settlement, open markets—we have to run all the time. We're concerned about things like cyber-security risk. Again, we have frameworks, standards, approaches to mitigate that risk, but we can't just rest on what we have. We have to keep up.
4:10 p.m.
Conservative
4:10 p.m.
NDP
Murray Rankin NDP Victoria, BC
Thank you, Chair.
Thank you, all the witnesses, for being here.
I'd like to start, if I could, please, with Mr. Eby of the Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association, and in doing so, pick up on something Mr. Keddy and Mr. Andrews asked you about, the issue of fees and regulation.
I'd like to say, sir, that one of the concerns that members of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business and small merchants in my riding of Victoria constantly bring up is a fear that mobile payment systems will result in higher credit card or debit card fees for merchants.
Some people in the mobile payment sector have appeared before this committee and they've indicated that telecommunications companies don't plan—at least at this stage—on adding or increasing fees along the chain of payments because of the mobile payment technology, presumably because of the very strong concerns that have been expressed by the people I mentioned.
As the CWTA, can you briefly confirm that your members have no intention of increasing or adding fees that will result in higher costs for merchants who accept mobile payments?
4:15 p.m.
Director, Regulatory Affairs, Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association
I can confirm that no one's ever indicated that to me as being a goal at all.
4:15 p.m.
NDP