Let me put it another way.
One of the main arguments against having publicly funded child care across the country is that we can't afford it. What I would like to point out is that money is being spent without evaluation or assessment of whether it actually does what it's intended to do. One of the members on this side said that everything must be results-based now. I guess what I was suggesting to the finance committee would be to examine those programs that are attached to child care that have objectives that I think should be assessed to see whether they're actually being met. We're spending a lot of money and we have no idea if we are getting any results from it. I'm not going so far as to say that money should be spent on the national child care program. It's in a more general sense to say that the idea that we can't afford a national child care program diminishes when you look at the spending of other associated money.