We certainly think the housing and homelessness needs across the country are different. They're different in Vancouver from what they are, for instance, in a small community in rural Newfoundland and Labrador, and different again in downtown Toronto, where I happen to live, from say, some parts of Quebec, which you're more familiar with.
There isn't such a thing as a “one size fits all”, and we're always very cautious when someone proclaims that there is a magic solution that will meet all the needs of the 200,000-plus homeless people in the country.
Certainly, Housing First is a very robust model. The federal government and the Mental Health Commission of Canada demonstrated through the At Home/Chez Soi project that for the 3,000 homeless people who were part of that project, it was the difference literally between life and death and resulted in housing stability. So we know that that model works, but it doesn't work for everyone, and it shouldn't be imposed.
Similarly, on the financing thing we're saying that the federal government does need to increase investments, but we also think the federal government needs to look for alternative and other investments as well. We know that the federal government alone can't solve the housing and homelessness infrastructure needs of Canadians.