Just on that alone, I want to talk about the financing option.
To the RBC, you talked about a seven-year average. So you're looking at a 10-year financing for a vessel, five years for the licence. Now, the five years for the licence seems to be a pretty short timeframe. It was in October 2008 that you had the decision, which involved you, of course, Saulnier v. Royal Bank. So then you have a legitimate piece of property, or at least under the law. The Supreme Court says you're looking at it, so even though it's common property you're still looking at something that is legitimate to use.
My question is why the short period of time on the five years?