Perhaps I can start on the latter question.
If you look at the TAC over the last number of years, I think you'll see that it has been going downwards from the peak of about 30,000 tonnes on this cycle. The trajectory has been known and the reductions have been taking place. There was a request put forward over the last couple of years that we try to slow down that reduction, as we were going through it, and we indicated that it would have the risk of making the subsequent reductions more. You can't catch it twice, obviously, so if you took crab last year, it means that you can't take it again this year. To that the stakeholders said, “Well, that's what we're prepared to accept.”
So we could see this coming. We knew we were in a downward trend and we were reducing the TAC. That said, there are a lot of safety nets in this fishery because of the fact that we only take a portion of the population, and even that portion that we do take actually has the chance to reproduce before it is removed from the population in the fishery.
So it was seen. We knew it was coming. We had talked to fishermen about the need to adjust and there were adjustments taking place. In hindsight, obviously, perhaps people would have said to themselves, “Maybe I shouldn't have asked for that extra couple of thousand tonnes last year”, and we should have moved more quickly. But we do have a process that engages them in helping the decision-makers come to a conclusion.
As long as the risks were acceptable, we could heed that input. This year--