Thank you very much, Mr. Chair, and thank you, witnesses. I'm not a regular member of the fisheries committee, but this discussion is very familiar because I chaired a fisheries committee for a week of hearings in B.C. on this very same subject. I'm shocked that some of the same questions are continuing to go around.
I do want to say, in beginning, congratulations to you both and to the community for bringing your issues forward. I do think—and I'll say it to the government members opposite—it's unfair to expect community groups, which weren't provided with the funding to take on this issue, to answer these scientific questions. It is DFO's responsibility to answer those scientific questions, and they should be answering those questions.
I will say this as well, based on my own experience: I do think DFO is very much caught in a contradiction. On the one hand, their mandate is to protect the wild fishery, and on the other, they're caught in the kind of trap they're in—I'm not accusing them of anything—of also having aquaculture under their mandate and the jobs it creates. They are caught in a contradiction.
I'll start my questions from there.
First, what company is involved in this 208-acre operation you're talking about?