Well, given that some of these quotas are in areas that are to the far north and beyond the reach of the vessels, other than with freezing technology—because you're too far to keep the shrimp fresh and get it back to a plant in the further north—the most beneficial use of the offshore licences was where it was tied back to inshore areas, such as in the coast of Labrador, where the Labrador Fishermen's Union Shrimp Company has played a role, such as in Fogo Island.
But again, it should be tied to adjacency. We can't use that to support the economy of the entire country. Nobody else is expected to do so with their resources. So yes, they can be used. Really, the question is that there's a real threat to the future survival of the economy of coastal communities in our province. That's why we're here and why we feel so strongly about the way that the brunt of their cuts got taken on the inshore sector in a way that was not at all a reflection of the way the increases went on, despite some of the evidence the committee heard.