Sure. Thanks, Deputy.
I'll just add that in terms of the Pacific Salmon Foundation, you know they used to get one dollar out of every six from the conservation stamp. They now get six, so they get the whole thing. It is an extra $1 million for them. In addition to the restoration work, they're on the cutting edge. They're dealing with partners. They're dealing with science. They're connected to people who we need to be connected to. It has been an enormously useful partnership for us, and they're doing really important work in terms of supporting us with salmon management long term.
There have been reductions, which you've spoken to, in terms of staff working on the fisheries protection program. I would say that the program has changed. Our focus, in terms of the regulatory regime, is around significant impacts to fish and around major projects. The other part of our focus is developing partnerships with those groups who are out in the field, through the recreational fisheries partnership program, through the Pacific Salmon Foundation program, through the funds that we provided to the Atlantic salmon foundation that's doing work. It really is a somewhat different focus.
What we need to be able to do—and we do believe that we have the ability—is to look at the major projects that are being done and ensure ourselves that we're protecting, in terms of the potential impacts on those fisheries. We're confident that we can do that.
What we've done is we've consolidated from 63 offices to 16. We've built some economies of scale. We've pulled people together in different offices. We've identified centres of expertise, and we're operating on a different model. As I said, we're partnering with community groups who are helping us in fisheries management and protection.