Yes. Well, the reason we weren't that interested to start with was because—and the EU actually shares this view—we think the best place to deal with subsidies is at the WTO. Very few countries are going to be prepared to take obligations on subsidies in a bilateral agreement and, in effect, disarm themselves against the rest of the world. So we weren't prepared to do that either.
But the battle we had with the EU on subsidies was that they wanted to exclude the fisheries sector and they wanted to exclude the agriculture sector. We said that if we were going to have any kind of treatment of subsidies in this agreement, it had to include agriculture and fish as well. But at the same time we're not looking at obligations that are going to change the way we provide assistance to the fisheries sector now.
What we've agreed to is that we would have notification requirements on subsidy programs, so if you're introducing a new program, you'd have to notify the other side so they are aware. In the event that a subsidy program from one party or the other is causing damage to the interests of the other side—