There was section 35 in the previous version of the act, which basically said that you can't harmfully alter, disrupt, or destroy fish habitat with any project. What it now says is that you can't cause serious harm to fish “that are part of a commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fishery, or to fish that support such a fishery”.
Then “serious harm” is defined, and “serious harm” is defined as “the death of fish or any permanent alteration to, or destruction of, fish habitat”. So habitat remains protected.
The bar is a little different from “harmful alteration, disruption, or destruction” to “permanent alteration” or “destruction”, but it's also linked to ongoing productivity of the fishery. Section 6 basically says that here are the factors the minister must take into account. The idea is that with respect to any project, the impact of the ongoing productivity of the fishery on the habitat is where we will determine whether it's permanent alteration or destruction.
Habitat continues to be in the act. Habitat continues to be protected. There are other elements, such as aquatic invasive species and others that we're now protecting as well that we weren't before, but habitat is still in there.