This was a trade arrangement, so it was focused on tariffs and trade access. We've always had information sharing. When we go to something like NAFO, we have relationships with other jurisdictions, and we talk about that. We have international collaborative arrangements.
For example, in the north Pacific, where we have joint operations with the U.S. and Russia, and Japan is now involved in terms of providing bases, there's a lot of sharing of expertise. Our enforcement people get together with counterparts in other countries around those kinds of forums. If they go to ICCAT, they have a chance to sit down and talk to enforcement people from all sorts of jurisdictions. They do that, and they share information and best practices. As we move ahead, if we are, as we pass the coastal fisheries protection act, that will again set up the opportunity to have more of that kind of sharing.
We've attended gatherings of law enforcement people internationally to compare notes, what the problems look like internationally, how they're solving them, how they're addressing them. It's not related to the trade agreement, but it is something that we do.