I think you have to look at it from both sides of that question. If you put it on the table as a make-or-break issue, what would happen? Would we forgo all those millions of dollars or not? By keeping it separate, it allows us to continue our challenge, that process, without having it subject to the CETA, subject to the arrangement, or subject to having everybody looking at it from the total and putting on that equation.
The decision was made that we'd be better all around to move ahead on CETA and keep our flexibility to move with a challenge to the European ban through the WTO.