Evidence of meeting #9 for Fisheries and Oceans in the 41st Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was first.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Georges Etoka

3:50 p.m.

NDP

Robert Chisholm NDP Dartmouth—Cole Harbour, NS

I love to sit here and listen to Mr. MacAulay, with his vast experience and so on, but the only point I'm raising here is that in terms of the amount of time, it's way out of proportion, that's all, if we have a short period of time. That gives Mr. MacAulay 15 minutes in those two rounds and gives us 20 minutes.

It would balance out over a two-hour stretch. That's certainly what I've seen in other committees. I've just noticed it over the last few hearings. I think we need to get a little more of a whack at things and then bring him in on the third round. Then he's good to go.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rodney Weston

Basically, when you look at total time, what Mr. Chisholm is suggesting is that in the first two rounds you would be reduced from 12 minutes to 10.

That's what you're suggesting.

Mr. MacAulay.

3:55 p.m.

Liberal

Lawrence MacAulay Liberal Cardigan, PE

Basically, that would be my input. All I can do is beg for the committee's indulgence to leave it as it is.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rodney Weston

Mr. Kamp.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

Randy Kamp Conservative Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission, BC

Could I just ask for clarification on the second round being proposed? Were we shortening the second round or having this long list as per the clerk's sheet here?

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rodney Weston

We're shortening the second round. The timeframe will remain the same at five minutes per questioner, but now the second round would consist of NDP, Conservative, NDP, Conservative, and Conservative, as per Mr. Chisholm's suggestion, rather than what we've had in the past, which was NDP, Conservative, NDP, Conservative, Liberal, NDP, Conservative, and Conservative.

We're losing two members, so we're taking out one NDP and one Conservative from the second round. Mr. Chisholm's suggestion was to remove the Liberal as well from the second round.

Mr. Chisholm.

3:55 p.m.

NDP

Robert Chisholm NDP Dartmouth—Cole Harbour, NS

I think it's especially important that we revise that, given that we're shortening it. Right?

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rodney Weston

The second round is going to be considerably shorter.

3:55 p.m.

NDP

Robert Chisholm NDP Dartmouth—Cole Harbour, NS

Then we'll have 15 minutes, and he'll have 12 minutes.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rodney Weston

No.

3:55 p.m.

NDP

Robert Chisholm NDP Dartmouth—Cole Harbour, NS

No, we'll have 20 minutes, and he'll have 15.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rodney Weston

Yes, 20 and 15 is what it would be.

3:55 p.m.

NDP

Robert Chisholm NDP Dartmouth—Cole Harbour, NS

That's just a suggestion.

As I said, this is what I've seen in other committees. I think it works a little better and it's fairer in terms of the proportion of members on the committee.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rodney Weston

It would mean the Conservatives would have 25 minutes in the first two rounds; the NDP would have 20 minutes; and the Liberal would have 10 minutes. Is that correct?

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

Randy Kamp Conservative Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission, BC

I think we would have 30 if it's NDP, Conservative, NDP, Conservative, in the second round. Is that what you said?

3:55 p.m.

A voice

No, there are two Conservatives.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rodney Weston

No, there are three Conservatives in the second round.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

Randy Kamp Conservative Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission, BC

We have two 10-minute blocks in the first round.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rodney Weston

Oh, you're right. It's 35. I said 25. It is 35.

Mr. Kamp.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

Randy Kamp Conservative Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission, BC

Would it help to make the second round quite abbreviated—just four slots again: NDP, Conservative, NDP, Conservative—and then start a third round, perhaps with a Liberal leading that round, or one of us? I'm not sure. There is no Liberal in the second round, but it's a shorter second round.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rodney Weston

You're suggesting the Conservatives would drop one, so the second round would consist of only five minutes, NDP, Conservative, NDP, Conservative, and then the third round would be—

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

Randy Kamp Conservative Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission, BC

It's just a thought.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rodney Weston

— a five-minute round, and it would start with the Liberal. Okay.

Mr. MacAulay.

3:55 p.m.

Liberal

Lawrence MacAulay Liberal Cardigan, PE

This is just a suggestion, but what if I had five minutes in the second round at the end instead of the seven? Then it would be fair.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

Randy Kamp Conservative Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission, BC

Well, that's what you have.