Thank you.
Before the changes to the act, in the old act there was a prohibition against destroying fish by any means other than fishing or carrying on any undertaking that would result in “harmful alteration, disruption or destruction” of fish habitat, or HADD.
On the new concept of “serious harm”, would you say that it adheres to the precautionary approach in managing our fish habitat?
I'll leave that open to anyone who would like to talk about it.