Evidence of meeting #11 for Foreign Affairs and International Development in the 40th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was lanka.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Robert Dietz  Asia Program Coordinator, Committee to Protect Journalists, As an Individual
Harini Sivalingam  Policy Director, Canadian Tamil Congress
Jonathan Papoulidis  Senior Policy Advisor, Peacebuilding and Humanitarian Affairs, World Vision Canada
David Poopalapillai  Public Relations Director and National Spokesperson, Canadian Tamil Congress
Sharmila Rajasingam  Member, Canadian Tamil Congress

3:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kevin Sorenson

Good afternoon, everyone.

This is the eleventh meeting of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, on Wednesday, March 25, 2009. This afternoon we're continuing our hearings in regard to the situation in Sri Lanka.

In our first hour, appearing as an individual, we have Robert Dietz, who is the Asia program coordinator of the Committee to Protect Journalists.

As you know, the committee provides time for each witness to make a short opening statement. Then we move into the first, second, and third rounds of questioning.

We certainly welcome you here today, Mr. Dietz. Please begin. We look forward to your comments. We thank you for coming here today on this very important topic.

3:30 p.m.

Robert Dietz Asia Program Coordinator, Committee to Protect Journalists, As an Individual

Thank you very much for the opportunity to speak here, members of the committee.

My comments here today are based on CPJ's research, including a 10-day reporting trip to Colombo, from January 21 to February 1, 2009. I was there about a month and a half ago. I've also submitted a longer version of my presentation to the committee, which was posted online under the title “Sri Lanka special report: Failure to Investigate”. The report is available on CPJ's website. I've made the report available to the committee staff.

I'll summarize the information in that report and update it with information about new events. I'm afraid my updates will uphold the concerns the report raised when it was first printed.

The Sri Lankan government is pursuing journalists who dare criticize the government, and the climate of impunity with which journalists have been killed, threatened, and harassed under the Rajapakse government has not abated. I went to Colombo because Sri Lankan journalists are under intensive assault. The government has failed to carry out effective and credible investigations into the killings of and attacks on journalists who question its conduct of a war against Tamil separatists or who criticize the military establishment in virtually any way.

Three attacks in January targeting the mainstream media drew the world's attention to the problem, but top journalists have been killed, attacked, threatened, and harassed since the government began to pursue an all-out military victory over the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, LTTE, in late 2006. Many local and foreign journalists and members of the diplomatic community believe the government is complicit in these attacks. The aim of my trip in January was to investigate three attacks.

On January 6, the main control room of Sirasa TV, Sri Lanka's largest independent broadcaster, was destroyed when an explosive device, most likely a claymore mine, was detonated at 2:35 a.m. during a raid by 15 to 20 masked men.

Two days later, on January 8, Lasantha Wickramatunga, the editor-in-chief of the independent newspaper The Sunday Leader, was killed while driving to work. He was attacked by eight men riding four motorcycles. He died from a wound to his right temple caused by a pointed object, mostly likely an iron bar, which pierced his temple. The attack happened about 200 yards from a large Sri Lanka air force base. After the attack, the hooded men rode off in that direction. Although the report from the judicial medical officer, Sri Lanka's equivalent of a coroner, was to be released on February 6, it has not been made public.

On January 23, Upali Tennakoon, an editor at the Sinhalese newspaper Rivira, and his wife were attacked in a manner similar to the attack on Wickramatunga. In this case, there were four men on motorcycles. They attacked with wooden and iron bars, staving in the windshield of the car, and then piercing Tennakoon's hands and giving him a large wound beneath his right eye. The couple left Sri Lanka soon after Tennakoon was released from the hospital.

In all three cases, the government has promised full investigations.

Now let me give you a brief update on those cases since then. This is fairly recent information from the last day or two.

There have been no arrests or any more information released about the bombing at Sirasa TV. In fact, in practical terms, the investigation has ended, with no conclusion.

In Upali Tennakoon's case, police say they have made no movement toward an arrest of anyone for the attack and consider the investigation at a dead end.

A bit more complex is the killing of Lasantha Wickramatunga. There was a hearing, most recently on March 19. As for the judicial medical officer's report, you're most likely familiar with that term. In the United States, we call him the coroner. The coroner's report still has not been made public, although the magistrate hearing the case said Wickramatunga's death came from a gunshot wound. The magistrate did not mention anything about the JMO's report--the coroner's report--and did not give a date for its release. The murder weapon has not been found. There was no bullet found inside Wickramatunga's head and there were no shell casings at the scene of the crime.

Wickramatunga's wife, Sonali, has written to the inspector general of police asking that he record a statement from the defence ministry spokesman, Keheliya Rambukwella, to ascertain the identify of Wickramatunga's assassins. Shortly after the killing, Rambukwella told the media that he and President Rajapakse were aware of the identity of the murderers and that the President would make the facts known on February 15. Since that statement, that promise, there has been no statement whatsoever about this case.

Two relevant cases making their way through the courts now should be mentioned.

Nadesapillai Vithyatharan, who is the editor of the Tamil daily Sudar Oli, was grabbed at a friend's funeral in a Colombo suburb on February 26. Since then, in an effort to charge the editor under anti-terrorism laws, police have been scouring phone records to try to establish a tie between the editor and the secessionist LTTE.

Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapakse has already linked the editor to a February 20 suicide air attack on Colombo in which two LTTE planes were shot down, two pilots killed, and more than 45 people injured. When the case came up on March 23 in Colombo, the magistrate gave permission to hold him without charge as they continue to trace his calls.

The other case also involves a Tamil editor, J.S. Tissainayagam, which is finally going to trial after a year. Tissa, as he is known, was detained without charge on March 7, 2008, and held without explanation for almost six months. In August he was charged under the protection of terrorism act and the emergency regulations. Tissa's case was the first time a Sri Lankan journalist was charged under these laws for his published work. The defence has started to present its case, and the trial will most likely end in late April or early May.

On March 20 Tissa testified again, as he has done at several other hearings, that he was forced to sign a confession after prisoners and colleagues were beaten in front of him, a claim that he made several times in court. Tissa explains that he has detached retinas in both eyes. The police know, or his captors know, that if he's beaten severely about the head, he might lose his vision, and that would become a cause for an argument for Tissa.

Also, in Vithyatharan's case, just yesterday, for I think the fifth time in three years, a hand grenade was thrown into the building of the sister paper of Vithyatharan, which is printed in Jaffna. It's called Uthayan.

Our concern here is that the use of state security or counterterrorism laws to prosecute journalists is a pattern we have seen before, particularly in countries with authoritarian governments. Our concern is very much that Sri Lanka is headed in that direction.

The lack of reliable investigation into these crimes is in keeping with the long history of impunity for those who attack journalists in Sri Lanka. CPJ counts 10 journalists killed by premeditated murder since 1999, with no--zero--prosecutions or convictions. The Rajapakse government and its predecessors must at least be held responsible for the impunity that surrounds the attacks on journalists, and many people consider the previous governments and the Rajapakse government themselves responsible for some of the attacks.

Most of the killings that we count came while President Rajapakse served as Prime Minister, from April 24, through the time he started his six-year term as President in November 2005, and up until now. According to CPJ's records, during his time in high office in Sri Lanka, eight journalists have died of what CPJ considers to premeditated murder. No one has been brought to trial in any of these cases. The number of dead does not include journalists killed in crossfire or other events while covering the war. We are talking about people who were intentionally killed.

I've spoken at length about the attacks on Sri Lankan journalists, but I must address just one more issue. No foreign or Sri Lankan reporters have recently been allowed to travel independently to the front lines of the conflict with the LTTE. Charges of misconduct against both sides have gone uninvestigated by independent journalists. We're not just talking about the government restricting access; we're also talking about the LTTE restricting access.

Journalists have had to rely on second-hand information from both sides of the conflict and from the few aid groups that are still able to operate in and around the combat zone. CPJ calls on both sides to allow all journalists to personally assess the risks involved and to travel and report freely from the front lines of this war, which has taken so many lives.

Let me conclude with this one simple line: with a failure to investigate and a realistic suspicion that government actors are complicit in the violence against journalists, the time has come for the international community to act.

I have a list of recommendations, but I think I'll stop there and respond to questions, if that's okay.

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kevin Sorenson

Thank you very much, Mr. Dietz.

We'll move into the first round. Mr. Rae.

3:40 p.m.

Liberal

Bob Rae Liberal Toronto Centre, ON

Thank you, Mr. Dietz. Thank you very, very much.

Just so you know, I'm going to have two questions for you, because we have a very short timeframe for questions and answers. The first question is a little personal, if you like, in terms of your own extensive experience in Asia and many other places.

You've lived in Asia during a time of a significant deterioration in the quality of life in Sri Lanka and the situation generally. How would you rate the overall climate with respect to the practise of journalism in Sri Lanka compared to the other countries in Asia you've been working in?

3:40 p.m.

Asia Program Coordinator, Committee to Protect Journalists, As an Individual

Robert Dietz

Let's deal directly with Sri Lanka. For a long time Sri Lanka, despite all this pressure on journalists, has had a vibrant press. Largely that's because it's very often tied to one party or another, or one political group or another. That continues to exist. There still are newspapers, which appear in Tamil, Sinhalese, and English, that are openly critical of the government, but there are fewer and fewer.

When you look at the situation, I see greater repression of media coming in Sri Lanka. We're seeing a very rapid shrinking of the space within which journalists can operate.

CPJ is aware of eight senior journalists--and we're not talking about small fry--who have left the country. They have stopped writing. They have fled for their safety, greatly concerned. Some of them were Tamils, some were Muslims, and some were Sinhalese. A lot of them were defence columnists, which is a very large industry in Sri Lanka. We've seen that people who dare to take on the military establishment in any way--critical reporting on the war, covering corruption in the military, or arms and weapons acquisitions, those sorts of dealings--have been criticized, harassed, and specifically cited by the defence ministry.

The defence secretary, Gotabhaya Rajapakse, is the brother of President Mahinda Rajapakse. He has been very brutally blunt about journalists who would dare criticize the military or the military establishment, and he does not hesitate to call people traitors. Using the term “traitor” is much more than just a rhetorical device, frankly; it's a hook on which you can proceed to bring legal charges.

More now than ever before, I'm afraid we see Sri Lanka media under attack. I would worry about its future.

3:40 p.m.

Liberal

Bob Rae Liberal Toronto Centre, ON

Thank you. I appreciate those comments.

You mentioned at the end of your remarks that you had some recommendations. I'm sure the committee would like to hear what they are.

3:40 p.m.

Asia Program Coordinator, Committee to Protect Journalists, As an Individual

Robert Dietz

Let me go to them.

3:40 p.m.

Liberal

Bob Rae Liberal Toronto Centre, ON

I'm sorry, they're here. But you may want to get them on the record.

3:40 p.m.

Asia Program Coordinator, Committee to Protect Journalists, As an Individual

Robert Dietz

Let me try to go down this list and expand on it.

When I was in Colombo, I spoke with three different diplomatic missions, but not the Canadian mission. They said they'd found the government unresponsive and they were grappling with ways to try to engage the President's office largely in terms of international criticism and international pressure. The feeling was that there was little, if any, leverage left to move the government. There was talk of using IMF loans, EU trade and tariff agreements, and those kinds of things to try to convince the government to change its tactics, of course, on a whole range of human rights and civil liberty issues.

Frankly, I think that kind of pressure has to be continued. I know that some of the embassies--well, the embassies with which I spoke--had played a prominent role in speaking out when these issues arose. I also appreciate that other embassies and other diplomatic missions might be operating more subtly or quietly.

Of all the options and all the hopes for trying to convince the President's office—and you get to see these very much as personalities at this point—I think that trying to convince the Rajapakse family to begin to adhere to some kind of norm and some kind of civility is important.

Frankly, we've seen these attacks on the media coincide fairly closely with the increase in the government's military activities in the north and taking on the LTTE. Once the government decided it was going to push for an all-out military victory and try to end this war once and for all, it was very clearly decided that they would no longer brook any kind of criticism on the home front from opposition papers or anyone else. There's a pretty clear correlation between a move towards that war and a move towards a much higher level of press suppression.

Those are my recommendations.

We are looking for governments such as Canada and certainly my own county, the United States, to engage and to do it in a way that makes it quite clear to the people in power that this isn't tolerable. There are options and there are other levers to be used. Frankly, I still see President Rajapakse as being very hardline and surrounded by people who are supporting these kinds of militant responses, but I still see an opportunity to engage with him and parts of the other government to try to change their policies.

I think I've gone on a bit too long. I'm sorry.

3:45 p.m.

Liberal

Bob Rae Liberal Toronto Centre, ON

No, that's fine. Thank you very much.

3:45 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kevin Sorenson

Thank you.

We'll move to Monsieur Dorion.

3:45 p.m.

Bloc

Jean Dorion Bloc Longueuil—Pierre-Boucher, QC

Mr. Dietz, how many journalists have died in the line of duty in the last 10 years?

3:45 p.m.

Asia Program Coordinator, Committee to Protect Journalists, As an Individual

Robert Dietz

We've counted 10 since 1999, I believe. The largest number of those deaths has come in recent years during the Rajapakse government. We have seen an acceleration of that.

The greater issue here is that journalists have often been under fire in Sri Lanka. Despite the open media, it's a pretty rough game that has been going on there. Under the Rajapakse government, we've seen an acceleration of those attacks on the media. Frankly, we were aware of it and we had the data. But after I went to Colombo and then came back and began to sift through the data and work with it, we realized things had accelerated and had increased in that period.

3:50 p.m.

Bloc

Jean Dorion Bloc Longueuil—Pierre-Boucher, QC

I have heard that there were 16, of whom 10 were intentionally killed.

3:50 p.m.

Asia Program Coordinator, Committee to Protect Journalists, As an Individual

Robert Dietz

Ten were killed intentionally, as we see them. As I said before in my presentation, we're not counting people who were caught in crossfire covering the war or who might have died accidentally in a helicopter crash or something like that. These 10 people were killed intentionally in what we consider to be premeditated murder.

3:50 p.m.

Bloc

Jean Dorion Bloc Longueuil—Pierre-Boucher, QC

You mentioned the ethnic and religious diversity. Is there any part of the Sinhalese-language media that is critical of the government? Does the Sinhalese media support the government all the time?

3:50 p.m.

Asia Program Coordinator, Committee to Protect Journalists, As an Individual

Robert Dietz

No. The largest number of people who have been killed, the largest number of journalists who have been killed, have been Tamils. But Lasantha Wickramatunga, for instance, and Upali Tennakoon-the two cases I mentioned--are both Sinhalese. The targeting seems to break down not on ethnic lines so much anymore as on political affiliations and whether people are critical or not.

I'd also like to point out that while we have this number of people killed, we also have eight people who feel they have fled their country to save their lives. These are people who were not killed and who, frankly, do not wish to go back any time soon. Their attitudes cover a wide range of responses, and in all honesty, I've been asked not to mention names or certainly make targets or bring publicity to their cases. Many of them want to return to their families, their homeland, their careers, but feel they don't have the protection from the police--even when they ask for it, and it's been withdrawn at times--to feel they can return home safely.

So in addition to that number of journalists who have been killed, also consider these at least eight other people, really. And there's a wide range--they are Sinhalese, they are Muslim, and they are Tamil--who frankly are afraid to go home specifically because they fear being killed. Add those to your mental list of people whose lives are in danger.

3:50 p.m.

Bloc

Jean Dorion Bloc Longueuil—Pierre-Boucher, QC

So what do you suggest the international community should do to guarantee the safety of journalists in Sri Lanka?

3:50 p.m.

Asia Program Coordinator, Committee to Protect Journalists, As an Individual

Robert Dietz

I think the best thing for governments to do is to engage on a governmental level and on a diplomatic level with Sri Lanka to continue to present these concerns, to speak with the President's office, speak with the attorney general's office, and if possible, speak with the ministry of defence, although I think they will be the hardest case to crack. Find those people within the government, from the President's office on down, identify them, work with them, and continue to bring this sort of diplomatic pressure.

This is not a government filled with raving maniacs. This is not a government filled with hardline, ideologically driven people. I think a great number of people feel supportive of this war effort, about which internationally there are certainly mixed feelings. But I think within the Government of Sri Lanka, there are still people, individuals and ministries, who will hear these messages and who will deliver these up the line to the President and to the rest of his family.

There are options of sanctions, there are options of isolation, there are options of financial pressure, and I think those should be considered. But I still see this as a group of people who have taken a very hard line but can still be spoken with.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kevin Sorenson

Thank you, Mr. Dorion.

Mr. Obhrai, please.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

Deepak Obhrai Conservative Calgary East, AB

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Mr. Dietz, thank you for coming.

That is a very bleak picture, but we are aware that these things happen. Aside from you, which other groups of journalists do you know to be speaking out against the war, as your report, “Failure to Investigate”, indicates? Forget about the governments. What about journalists?

3:55 p.m.

Asia Program Coordinator, Committee to Protect Journalists, As an Individual

Robert Dietz

Certainly, our colleagues and Reporters Without Borders have been doing a very good job. They've been in and out of the country, as we have. It is of some concern that within Sri Lanka the journalists unions are organized mostly along ethnic or religious lines. There is a Tamil media alliance; there are Muslim journalists, Sinhalese journalists, etc. There is also a group called the Free Media Movement, which is the umbrella organization for those groups. In the past, they have been able to maintain some sort of solidarity in a culture that is ethnically riven. They have been able to overcome some of that.

The Free Media Movement itself is struggling to stay on its feet. They've had some internal problems. There are viable journalist organizations and newspaper editor organizations that meet with the President and that put pressure on him. There is a South Asian media alliance. There are several other groups. Clearly, Sri Lanka recognizes a problem. People are engaged in a fairly concerted effort to try to reason with the government.

Groups like us are swatted away like flies. The Canadian or American ambassador or someone from the EU carries more weight. We speak with the diplomatic missions, and they count on us for information. In turn, we count on them for perspective in our approaches. So there is a fairly united front going up against this oppression. One of the problems is that when you begin to be critical of the government, the issue immediately becomes whether or not you support the LTTE. That is always woven into the discussion fairly quickly. Most groups have been able to stay away from that, not debating whether the war against the LTTE is appropriate or not, whether it's a violation of human rights, or whether it's a viable response to terrorism. There are many ways to weigh this.

We have been able to stay fairly well focused on the issue of journalists and journalists' freedom. I've testified in front of the United States Senate at a hearing very similar to this. I'm testifying here. I speak frequently to a lot of groups in Washington. I'm surprised and pleased to say that the issues of journalism, the rights of journalism, and what it represents in a free society have been treated very seriously. I don't think the issues have gone unnoticed. They're well represented and well argued. You have to interpret the crackdown on journalists and journalism as part of a broader human rights issue in Sri Lanka.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

Deepak Obhrai Conservative Calgary East, AB

These attacks that you have investigated, did they increase after the peace process collapsed?

4 p.m.

Asia Program Coordinator, Committee to Protect Journalists, As an Individual

Robert Dietz

Yes, but we count the ten murders we're reporting from 1999. When we saw the peace process start to collapse and realized that the government was committed to winning the war, that's when we saw the attacks increase. Journalism is a hard game. When you're a journalist, you're an easy target in Sri Lanka. But with the collapse of the peace talks, with the ramping up of the military effort, we have also seen an increase in the attacks on journalists on the home front.

4 p.m.

Conservative

Deepak Obhrai Conservative Calgary East, AB

Can you make a comment on this journalist who was killed who said, “If I die, the President will know who my killers are.” He was a friend of the President. Would that not indicate somehow that if the President was aware of that, then for some reason this President is weak, or would you tend to say he's a very strong individual?