Evidence of meeting #46 for Government Operations and Estimates in the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was spending.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

David Moloney  Senior Assistant Secretary, Expenditure Management Sector, Treasury Board Secretariat
Wayne Wouters  Secretary, Treasury Board Secretariat
Nicole Jauvin  President, Public Service Human Resources Management Agency of Canada

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Garth Turner Conservative Halton, ON

Yes, I understand that quite clearly. But—

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Vic Toews Conservative Provencher, MB

I was getting to the point.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Garth Turner Conservative Halton, ON

That would be great.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Vic Toews Conservative Provencher, MB

The point is this. The increase in operating and capital costs reflects a commitment of the government to very significant priority areas—defence and security, agriculture, primary sectors, and families and communities—which are all areas, as I recall, you campaigned on in the last election, saying that the prior Liberal government had not met its commitments in respect of defence and security, agriculture and primary sectors, and families and communities.

This budget is very much consistent with the types of issues you raised during the last election.

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Garth Turner Conservative Halton, ON

Madam Chair, we have a very limited amount of time here. If the minister is going to give four-minute answers to a question and talk about what I campaigned on—No one cares what I campaigned on. We care about what the minister thinks, and that's why we're here.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Diane Marleau

And we're here about today, yes. Go ahead.

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Garth Turner Conservative Halton, ON

Thank you.

I'm interested, Minister, when we have federal spending that increases by six times the rate of inflation, if you are concerned at all about the inflationary impact of that spending. Has there been some serious consideration?

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Vic Toews Conservative Provencher, MB

First of all, maybe I can refer that question to the officials, because spending did not go up six times the rate of inflation.

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Garth Turner Conservative Halton, ON

We have an inflation right now of 2%, and we're talking about an overall increase in the current budget of 6% in realistic terms, and then we have 12%. But whether it's twice, three, or six times inflation, is there concern?

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Vic Toews Conservative Provencher, MB

Well, I think that is significant when you say whether it's twice, three times or six times. That is significant.

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Garth Turner Conservative Halton, ON

In 2006-07 the increase was 6%, which is three times the rate of inflation, so we'll deal with the budgetary estimates of 2006-07 of 5.9%, which is three times the existing inflation rate. Is there a concern that you or your colleagues have about the inflationary impact of that?

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Vic Toews Conservative Provencher, MB

What I can indicate in respect to the areas of concern was defence and security—

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Garth Turner Conservative Halton, ON

I asked you about inflationary impact, sir. Do you have an answer on that?

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Vic Toews Conservative Provencher, MB

Yes. I'm telling you that the concern that we have is weighed against the pressures in defence and security—

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Garth Turner Conservative Halton, ON

I'm asking you an economic question, about the economic impact of the budget.

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Vic Toews Conservative Provencher, MB

—agriculture, primary sectors, and families and communities. We're looking at those pressures.

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Garth Turner Conservative Halton, ON

Madam Chair, can the witness please answer the questions that I ask.

If you don't want to answer, just say you'd rather not answer it. But I'm asking you an economic question, sir, not a policy one. I'm asking an economic question about the economic implications of spending $230 billion, which in this instance is three times the rate of inflation.

Are you concerned about the inflation? I've asked it three times.

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Vic Toews Conservative Provencher, MB

I think you have asked the question. I'm prepared to answer it.

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Garth Turner Conservative Halton, ON

Answer it, please.

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Vic Toews Conservative Provencher, MB

What I've indicated is that our government simply doesn't look at economic issues in and of themselves. Those economic issues have to be seen in the context of the pressures that Canadians are facing in respect of defence and security, and agriculture in the primary sectors—

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Garth Turner Conservative Halton, ON

I don't think that's answering the question. So you're not concerned about that. If you're not going to answer it, let's move on.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Diane Marleau

Let him go on with his next point.

Let's go on to the next point.

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Garth Turner Conservative Halton, ON

Let's move on to the next question.

4:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Diane Marleau

You have two more minutes, if you'd like.

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Garth Turner Conservative Halton, ON

Okay.

The Minister of National Defence announced the other day $650 million for new tanks. The Prime Minister announced three weeks ago $1.1 billion for new spending on agricultural programs. Where are we finding this money? Is this reallocated money? Is it contained in your estimates right now? Specifically, let's just deal with the tanks.