We have you, Dr. Kendall, saying yes, it is reasonable to not have land conveyances included, and we have our other witness saying no, it's not reasonable. Is there a compromise here that would address your concerns, Dr. Kendall, or those of our friend from Quebec? Is there a compromise here that will meet the needs of Canadians while dealing with the public health issues?
On May 30th, 2007. See this statement in context.