Thank you.
We're debating this bill because the government has had the good sense to recognize that there are concerns in the public about potential harm in consumer products and imported products. So it's taking measures to protect the public.
So here is my question. Is the concern that this amendment is bad public policy, or is it that resources may be required to further protect the public? I think the public might think that this is a normal part of additional protection and might be supportive of the fact that it would cost government.