I'd like a further clarification of what you've just said, Mr. Glover.
There have been a number of groups concerned that CEPA isn't adequate protection. So when we're coming forward as a committee and the government is coming forward saying we want better protection to the public from harm or toxic elements in the products.... We've heard from groups that CEPA is not adequate. There is in fact a different approach, which mirrors the approach in this amendment, in countries in the European Union and in the United States.
So you're making a pitch that CEPA is adequate. These organizations are actually saying that it's not and that it hasn't protected consumers adequately. Are you saying they're wrong, or that we should hope that CEPA is going to do a better job in the future?