That's exactly what I was thinking. You could actually then provide, under this particular piece of legislation, in clause 15, personal information beyond the crib. It could be personal. Crib is not personal; what happened to the crib is not personal. For that, this is an area where you don't have to argue what you're arguing, because that example is not really valid in terms of your argument. Personal information isn't the crib or what happened to the crib; it's about the identity of the individual or something that might identify the individual. You haven't argued that at all.
My concern is that if you then did give personal information, you could as a government stand up and say, “Oh, sorry. We did that, but it was in the public interest”, because a court would then assess the situation as to whether or not it was in the public interest and would allow that to happen.
What I'm saying is that this particular regime that you have in clause 15, which is different from clauses16 and 17, doesn't provide the safeguards under those circumstances to individuals. I'm a little worried. I'm just expressing that to you.