Mr. Hamm, I am not talking to you about the relationship with Ms. Wilson. I am talking about the relationship with the other members on the board of directors. You keep repeating that, since the act is before the Supreme Court, the management process is very complex. It was to be expected that it would end up before the Supreme Court. Quebec was very clear on that.
Mr. Hamm, I must admit that I am shocked. When everything is fine, we don't expect five members of the committee to leave and we are not supposed to lose the legal expert, the ethics expert, the policy expert and the patient expert. It is difficult to justify. All these people leaving and what the three former members of the committee said—you heard them—make me really question your way of managing things.
How are you able to do it when you are missing five members and you lost, I repeat, your legal expert, your ethics expert, your policy expert and your patient expert?