Thank you.
I would like to come back to the idea of independent advice and planning for pesticide use.
Mr. Loessin clearly stated that pesticide use is part of a plan and subject to long-term planning. This use is adjusted based on the circumstances. When something doesn't go as expected and the desired results are not achieved, maybe because a product is no longer available or for some other reason, the plan must be adjusted as a result. There is also the fact that certain large farms or large crops may get help from people who are a little more qualified to do this planning, but other smaller farms may not necessarily have the same resources.
Would it be relevant for the act to include everything relating to advisory services for farmers so that pesticide use planning is the best possible? This should also be done independently to ensure that the best products are used, without farmers being pressured and without information being left out when it comes from one manufacturer in particular.
Ms. Dyer could also answer, since she didn't have time in the last round of questions.