When I mentioned sustainability, that dealt specifically with the mandate of the act, which talks about sustainable pest management strategies. Let's remember one thing. I mentioned one product earlier. It's Folicur. Folicur is a crop protection product used to prevent a fungus in grain. The layman's term for that fungus is “vomitoxin”. If anybody eats that grain.... Or in fact, I've seen it impact on people in dust; just from using the straw from that wheat, the dust will also affect people adversely.
The question is, should we be using a pesticide on this product? Well, of course. I mean, part of the risk cup analysis on that should be, what's the impact on humans if that fungus is in the grain? What's the impact on humans if that crop protection product is being used? So by “sustainable crop protection strategy” or “sustainable pest-management strategies”... it includes all of that. You can't take one and not use the other.
This is about crop protection products that pose the least risk to human health and safety as possible, but then this is also about providing farmers with a lower-cost product, products that are already in the market—so again, it's not a health and safety issue—so that they can be economically sustainable as well when they produce foods.