Again, I'll ask Monsieur Parent to intervene after this, but you're talking about equals. You don't have a relationship of hierarchy. So that's one thing that creates a difficulty in terms of what harassment is or could be. You are not dealing with situations of, for example, an employer and an employee, where there's the hierarchy, there's the perceived threat of consequences if harassment happens.
In this case here, by being equals, it's the House itself or this committee making a report proposing solutions in terms of what the consequences could be. For us that's a big difference in terms of defining what “harassment” is, because of the rules of debate and things that are said and done in the context of your jobs. There are a lot of things that happen by the pure nature of the work. You're looking at the extreme situations that you'd like to define. We could probably help you with a definition if you want to go that far, but with any definition, as always—we draft laws all the time—it's difficult. But that might be the only way for this committee to come up with something that's concrete enough.
I don't know if Pierre wants to add something.