Again, by looking at what we found in other jurisdictions, for example Quebec, western Australia, and I was referring to England and the Senate—not the Senate specifically—you will have a code of conduct dealing with more than harassment, as I explained, but essentially the same principle, where everything in there is still subject to the rules of parliamentary privilege. All these rules continue as they exist except you have a process as well to deal with specific situations of harassment.
The process would be there maybe to try to solve the issue, come up with a recommendation and hopefully a solution, yet the member and other members keep the right to raise the issue on the floor of the House if they feel, for example, that they were wrongly accused. That's always a privilege of members: to rise on a point of order and ask the Speaker to rule specifically on this. That reservation, subject to clauses in the code on parliamentary privilege, might be a way to explore this question.