Going back to what we said, the whole issue of dealing with parliamentary proceedings, what happens in Parliament—you're doing your role in the chamber of course, in committees, sometimes outside in public—there's a line somewhere that you have to trace. How far do we go into people's personal life or into situations that are outside of your role as parliamentarians? We certainly see that gap as a big one.
The other one is anything that you put in place should not conflict with all the rules that already exist. Essentially, as we've mentioned before, you look at O'Brien and Bosc and pretty much everything in the book has been considered at some point, except that right now harassment is obviously a very sensitive and difficult topic to deal with. How do we integrate all of this into the rules? Keeping the tradition and what exists versus being able to deal with a complex situation, that's the challenge. I'm not saying it cannot be done, but it warrants some thought.