I definitely do not know that there is any kind of fraud of that kind going on. What we were alluding to in our comments was based on our extrapolation of statistics--it's not based on experience--that 3.3 million electors do not have drivers' licences, and of the other 1.2 million, 10% have postal addresses instead of residential addresses on their drivers' licences.
What we're saying is we must anticipate that it will be difficult to get people to understand that they have to bring two pieces of ID to the polls, with their ID and their address on both. It's going to be difficult for Canadians to understand this. This is what I'm trying to underline to the committee here, which is why I proposed an alternative.
What I'm saying to you is the bill as it is drafted will create this situation, and what I've proposed is an alternative that in my view would obviate most of those difficulties.