Right, 91.1(1).
The point here is that he has a stricter criterion because, Mr. Chairman, he is looking at having the item removed and returned to the member, without having it appear on the notice paper. This is obviously a much stricter and tougher sanction, if you like, than what we're dealing with, which is simply to say that an item would become non-votable.
On this basis, Mr. Chair, I think there is a difference between what the Speaker was doing.... He had a more restrictive test. We have a broader test, because the action we will take is less drastic.
When you think of these things within the universe of bills out there, you'll see that they overlap substantially, rather like two items in a Venn diagram that overlap for the most part and leave a bit at the exterior. That is not enough to cause them not to be substantially similar.
Thank you.