First of all, thank you for that. In fact, Vancity's practice in the past has been to rely more heavily on rebates and also on the overall ability, as with any loan, of a particular riding or a particular candidate to raise money themselves. There's a whole bunch of factors, as they put it, that go into play.
When it comes to nomination contestants, we support Equal Voice in terms of saying that nomination contestant limits need to be much lower than they currently are. Internally, we as a party have set a limit of $5,000 on expenses for nomination races. It's a very small increase for geographical needs, if that's a need. In fact, that kind of limit is necessary. I think that levels the playing field a lot more than opening up much wider to bigger loans, because people who are disadvantaged more often than not don't have the ability to borrow relatively large sums of money. In fact, this is a positive thing. One day, I hope the committee and others will consider this in terms of legislation. So I don't see that as much of a concern.
In fact, the business case that's made for any loan is as good a case as any for a person's ability to go out and get the support they need, so I think there's a relationship there.