Obviously this is an eminently political question, and it's an issue, if you will, so I think it's really you, as the elected representatives, who would have a better sense of that than I would. Again, I think what they're trying to do is to make available, for instance.... Again, assuming the positive side of this, where one has, for example, members downloading their participation in statements by members or in question period or in debate, I think what they want to exclude is ostensibly something where you would be downloading another member to argue or to in some sense take issue with what that person said.
It strikes me that this kind of protection is not a bad thing to put in, simply because, in a sense, it says to members that we are going to police ourselves as we ask other people to. We're going to treat each other with the respect that we ask other people to use in terms of the actual proceedings; we won't use the proceedings for purposes of the political side of things, the party politics, if you will.