Thank you.
I see from the report our researchers have produced, doing a comparison of other jurisdictions, that there are other jurisdictions that allow for the use through webcasting, and the copyright or intellectual property is asserted but there's no charge. They can use it without any problem as long as it's for non-commercial purposes.
In some of those same jurisdictions, they also exclude the use of the proceedings in any medium for political advertising or election campaigning, except with the permission of all members shown—satire, ridicule or denigration, commercial sponsorship, or commercial advertising.
I would like your opinion, your best advice. Do you think we should come into the 21st century and allow for the downloads of whatever information is available on the House websites and the search engines, as long as there are these exclusions?