Thank you very much.
I know I am chiming in late in the game. But there are a few things I want to know about, and I will get into them as simply as possible, without simplifying the debate, of course.
If I understand correctly, there are constitutional rules that govern when Parliament can and cannot be prorogued, depending on the circumstances at play. It is not clearly defined, as I understand it. There is also the executive branch, the power of the Prime Minister to do what he pleases, to a certain extent. As long as the constitutional rules have not been set out clearly, is this not a red herring? Will it be absolutely necessary to clarify the Constitution, so as to ultimately clear up any confusion regarding prorogation, the rules of application, the appropriate procedure, the individual with the authority and so forth?