Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Let me just read what the second paragraph says, and you'll see, I think, why I think it should be removed. By the way, there are some odd capitalizations and there's a grammatical error in here. I think it should be a lower-case “s” in “speaking”.
That the parliamentary secretary, speaking for the minister, was himself misled when he spoke in the House on behalf of the minister, saying that “the Kairos application did not meet agencies' priorities”. We now know this also to be untrue. The parliamentary secretary has done the honourable thing and apologized to the House, as he too was misled.
We don't know that he was misled. I suspect if he was brought before this committee he would say he wasn't misled. He might say he misunderstood. You can see the distinction there. And because I know I'm going to be challenged on relevance or something, the reason I mention the distinction is that “misled” involves an outside agency.
If, Mr. Chair, you misled me as to the location of today's meeting by telling me it's in Room 112-North, then it is--