You're correct. It's a grey zone in the law. There's a provision in the act that allows a creditor to sue an EDA. In that context it gives it some personal, moral personality, if I can use that expression, even though it's not incorporated. That's one of the reasons I suggested that the party, at the end of the day, should be responsible for those debts.
On October 23rd, 2012. See this statement in context.