Thank you very much.
Sorry to make you go over ground that I think you've already covered here, but I'm trying to get it clear in my own head. Nathan said originally it's a difficult job for any commission, particularly when they're adding seats to a province. It's one thing if you're not adding anything and just trying to make changes within the existing construct, but here they're trying to add seats. So I'm wondering again, with the arguments that you have made to the commission when you appeared before it, even though you have brought forward some additional information since that time, what was their primary reason for, as my colleague said, ignoring, or I would say rejecting, your arguments at the hearing level, and coming forward with the map we see before us today? Were there a series of arguments? There must have been something—