Thank you very much.
I have questions for our representatives from the Competition Bureau.
I'm trying to get some clarity here because we've heard from members of the opposition throughout this examination of Bill C-23 that they believe the commissioner of elections should have the power to compel testimony, something that you currently have in the Competition Bureau.
My point is simply this. The power to compel against an individual that the commissioner of elections is trying to pursue, or is pursuing, couldn't ever be used because any testimony that came out of that wouldn't be accepted by the courts afterwards.
My understanding, in your particular case, is that the power to compel testimony is mainly due to, or for, administrative issues. Would that be a correct assessment? Or have you used this to try to compel an individual to come forward and provide testimony?