Okay.
I guess, when I think about it, there are actually two issues. One of them is the members' right of privilege to be on the Hill. The second might be the identification of members.
I took it from the individual who brought this forward that his other issue was that he verbally identified himself as a member of Parliament and in his mind that didn't change anything. Whether or not there's a better way that the security people can identify members of Parliament.... We're talking about 308 members of Parliament, plus senators, right? It's pretty difficult for everybody to recognize every individual for their role here.
I'm wondering if there's a broader way we can identify the members and/or, in addition, the role that parliamentarians play and their rights to unfettered access.