I'm sorry we were delayed a bit, but we seem to be having some procedural differences at the table.
Just to clarify to Mr. Telegdi, now I'm told by the clerk that I could have recognized the point of order while Mr. Komarnicki was speaking. I'm not going back to any of this, mind you, but to clarify what has happened, I could have recognized the point of order while he was speaking. But you cannot move a motion to challenge the chair on the point that I was supposed to go back to Mr. Komarnicki.
So for future reference, that's the procedure, according to the rules I'm told about by the clerk. However, what's done is done.