Yes, they do. They address some of them. They're not just my concerns; I think they're fundamental concerns. I think they do address clearly that the special advocate has access to the assessments and the documents on which those assessments are based at present.
The main thing is that once the special advocate has that access, at present the special advocate is not allowed to have any kind of communication about the case with either the appellant or the appellant's legal representatives, which means that you cannot properly challenge the evidence in the closed sessions because you haven't got a clue what the appellant's case on it might be. So if you're sharing the evidence with the detainee, then that would certainly be one way. But then there may be certain evidence that is withheld.
One of the problems that I think we have had is excessive secrecy. There are all kinds of things that are kept secret that really shouldn't be. That's something that is quite difficult to address in Britain without changing the legislation.