Evidence of meeting #16 for Citizenship and Immigration in the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was removal.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Rick Stewart  Associate Assistant Deputy Minister, Operations, Department of Citizenship and Immigration
Susan Kramer  Director, Inland Enforcement, Canada Border Services Agency
Brenna MacNeil  Director, Social Policy and Programs, Immigration Branch, Department of Citizenship and Immigration
Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Andrew Chaplin

3:55 p.m.

Director, Inland Enforcement, Canada Border Services Agency

3:55 p.m.

Bloc

Thierry St-Cyr Bloc Jeanne-Le Ber, QC

Earlier, Mr. Stewart told us that he did not have any figures about the number of people who have been removed to their country of origin before receiving a response from CIC. In your experience with public servants, what do those working on these files think? When faced with this type of situation, they must get a little angry and think that it is a failure, that something went wrong somewhere. Do you have an idea of the magnitude of the situation? Are they exceptional cases? Is this rather rare or common? Could you give the committee an idea?

3:55 p.m.

Director, Inland Enforcement, Canada Border Services Agency

Susan Kramer

I think we could say that it is rare. As Mr. Stewart said, we discuss the files, because it is not worth removing someone who will return the following day. So we try to work together to avoid such a situation.

3:55 p.m.

Bloc

Thierry St-Cyr Bloc Jeanne-Le Ber, QC

That is what you were referring to when you said in your speech that the agency does not often proceed with removals if it appears that the CIC decision is imminent on the application. You consult each other to find out if the decision is imminent, and if the department knows you are going to remove these people, it arranges things so the decision is imminent. Is that right?

3:55 p.m.

Director, Inland Enforcement, Canada Border Services Agency

3:55 p.m.

Bloc

Thierry St-Cyr Bloc Jeanne-Le Ber, QC

And so, in fact, if a person is subject to a removal order, it could speed up his application process.

3:55 p.m.

Director, Inland Enforcement, Canada Border Services Agency

Susan Kramer

Not necessarily, because it takes time before we are prepared to remove someone. It can even take years.

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

Thank you.

Ms. Chow, seven minutes.

Thank you, Mr. St-Cyr.

3:55 p.m.

NDP

Olivia Chow NDP Trinity—Spadina, ON

If there are H and C grounds for sponsoring a spouse, rather than through the specific class, it's still a spousal sponsorship. They take longer, right?

3:55 p.m.

Associate Assistant Deputy Minister, Operations, Department of Citizenship and Immigration

Rick Stewart

I'm sorry, which takes longer?

3:55 p.m.

NDP

Olivia Chow NDP Trinity—Spadina, ON

If it's applying--

3:55 p.m.

Associate Assistant Deputy Minister, Operations, Department of Citizenship and Immigration

Rick Stewart

Under the scope of the public policy?

3:55 p.m.

NDP

Olivia Chow NDP Trinity—Spadina, ON

--under humanitarian and compassionate grounds, sponsoring a common law partner or a spouse. So you have two categories. One is the spousal application, and the other is on H and C grounds. Right? So that takes quite a bit longer?

March 10th, 2008 / 4 p.m.

Brenna MacNeil Director, Social Policy and Programs, Immigration Branch, Department of Citizenship and Immigration

Are you referring to a separate agency application, not the public policy with respect to the in-Canada class?

4 p.m.

Associate Assistant Deputy Minister, Operations, Department of Citizenship and Immigration

Rick Stewart

We've used the public policy provisions under the H and C portion of the act to put people who wish to submit a spousal application, who are out of status, in the same standing as someone who is in status. So they are processed and treated in the same collection of applications that somebody in status would submit. So they fall under those timelines and are processed under that category.

4 p.m.

NDP

Olivia Chow NDP Trinity—Spadina, ON

I understand that, but for your H and C ground applications, normally the consideration takes a lot longer than six months. Am I correct?

4 p.m.

Associate Assistant Deputy Minister, Operations, Department of Citizenship and Immigration

Rick Stewart

Because they're being considered for factors other than spousal relationships.

4 p.m.

NDP

Olivia Chow NDP Trinity—Spadina, ON

Right, but it's quite long. Sometimes it could be a year. What's the average timeline?

4 p.m.

Associate Assistant Deputy Minister, Operations, Department of Citizenship and Immigration

Rick Stewart

The average time for processing H and C applications is 25 to 30 months, and that's a reflection of the volume of applications.

4 p.m.

NDP

Olivia Chow NDP Trinity—Spadina, ON

Then during this time you proceed with removals.

Maybe Ms. Kramer can answer this question. How many of these 12,637 people you remove have an H and C application while you are removing them?

4 p.m.

Director, Inland Enforcement, Canada Border Services Agency

Susan Kramer

There is a percentage of them who do.

4 p.m.

NDP

Olivia Chow NDP Trinity—Spadina, ON

What percentage?

4 p.m.

Director, Inland Enforcement, Canada Border Services Agency

Susan Kramer

I'll have to get you that. I don't have that right at my fingertips.

4 p.m.

NDP

Olivia Chow NDP Trinity—Spadina, ON

Would you be able to give it to us?

4 p.m.

Director, Inland Enforcement, Canada Border Services Agency