We believe that there should in fact be a follow-up. In my opinion the solution proposed by the committee could be quite interesting. I would note however that the department could never follow up 100% of all cases. An analysis would have to be based on risk. Obviously, if employers are well known, and they hire temporary workers every year for various activities, and we know what the company's reputation is, we may not need to go and see each employee, every year. We would need to identify the highest-risk cases and follow up on them.
On November 26th, 2009. See this statement in context.