Now you have a situation--which is a good one, I think--where the minister can request information and it has to be provided. I think that is a good thing. That's a complaint of members of CSIC now: they don't know what's going on. There isn't any built-in accountability.
So that's a good thing. However, there's no consequence built into it for failure to provide the information. So what do you do? Do you pull the designation? That seems to be the only thing: you undesignate. It seems to be the only remedy right now.
I don't know exactly what mechanism you could have. You could put it in a situation of fines or the potential for suspension, but how does it work if you suspend? Then you have to bring in trustees, because somebody has to run the organization. So it is a bit problematic to rely solely on a power of information.