Thank you, Mr. Chair.
In terms of my own questioning of the witnesses, I had established a direct linkage or a context to a security issue that the committee is indeed studying. Not to be argumentative here, but the marginalization through what is perceived in either perception or reality of an arbitrary process does indeed present the fostering of a potential security issue or security risk to the country. And it is therefore in keeping with the order of reference the committee has been tasked with.
Therefore, following on Mr. Weston's intervention, following on Mr. Weston's point of order, by questioning whether or not these topics are relevant to a security issue, I think we've established that both witnesses are providing the committee with valuable testimony in terms of determining what is a security risk and what Canada can increase its performance on with regard to that.